Weekend links on Friday the 13th

I’m going to be out of town for a few days, and there was quite a bit to do before I left, so haven’t been able to respond to your comments or emails of late.

I’ll be back next week and respond then. I have scheduled a few posts in advance so do expect to see more articles from next week.

I have quite a few links this week and since all of them have excellent titles I will take a shortcut and paste the links without describing them any more.

So you still think JP Morgan is short billions of ounces of silver? @ Kid Dynamite

Google Issues Statement on New Indian Web Rules @ WSJ

What happens when Sixth Sense meets an iPad @ Digital Inspiration

Withdrawal Rates @ Random Roger

Understanding investing risk is more than a qualitative assessment @ Tip Blog

Speak Asia Online – Too good to be true @ TFL

A few links that I re-tweeted on Twitter this week.

Anonymous: peering behind the mask @ Guardian (a good story on the hacktivist group)

This week’s best late night jokes @ About.com

Facebook-Google Privacy PR Smear Is A Campaign In An Epic, Escalating War @ Fast Company

ROI on homes is zilch in the past 35 years @ HBR

Enjoy your weekend!

Book Review: The Big Secret for the Small Investor

I finished reading The Big Secret for the Small Investor: A New Route to Long-Term Investment Success which is written by Joel Greenblatt last Sunday.

Before this I’ve read Greenblatt’s The Little Book That Beats The Market, and liked it quite a bit.

However, this book was very disappointing, and I wouldn’t recommend it to most people. The book is very short, some 150 pages or so, and even those are small pages, yet it feels like you’re just dragging along while reading most of it.

I felt that most of the book was just a very very long lead towards the central idea in it that comes at Chapter 8 (there are a total of 9 chapters).

The idea itself is not all that new, and it’s not very clear to me how a small investor can even go about implementing it.

I say the idea is not all that new because I feel it deeply draws from the concepts of value investing, and diversification, and the author doesn’t do much to build on those ideas for you to feel that you’ve discovered something new.

However, if you ask me if I’ve ever heard of it in the exact form as he describes, then no, I haven’t heard it in exactly that form.

This reminds me of a conversation that I had with someone a few years ago. We were discussing what a “new car” was.

If you buy a used car then is that a new car? It’s new for you, but it’s not really a new car. But surely, if you drove a car right out of a showroom – it’s brand new – isn’t it?

Well, yes and no. It’s definitely a new car if you’re looking at it from the perspective of a customer.

But, if you’re looking at it from the perspective of an Operations head in a factory (which I think is close to what the he was) it’s not a new car. It’s just coming from the existing line – and there is nothing new about it.

You don’t have to make new dyes, find new suppliers, establish quality parameters or do anything of the sort if just one more car is coming out. If you had to come up with a new model then you would have to do all this and that’s what his definition of a new car was.

You can go back and forth on this for hours together and I only take this example to say that I realize how someone could treat Greenblatt’s idea as new and find value in it, but I’m not that someone.

The Good Parts

I did read the whole book, and maybe I was disappointed because of the content in the earlier book and the high expectation it set for me.

There is nothing in the book that I disagree with, or find misleading. It’s a good, quick and simple read and if you’re just starting out your career in investing and lean towards value investing then this can prove to be a very useful resource.

However, if you have read a few books on investing, and valuing companies then you can give this a skip, and you won’t be losing out on much.

Disclosure: Link is affiliate.

 

Reply to All by default in Gmail

Most people who use MS Outlook as their work email probably use the “Reply to all” option a lot.

You probably get a lot of email addressed to more than one person, and are expected to reply with everyone in the loop.

Gmail is slightly different because most of the personal email is only addressed to you, however I’ve felt the need to Reply to all more and more in Gmail in the past few days and have never quite got used to the shortcut there.

The shortcut is simply the key “a”. If you’re reading a message with multiple people and hit “a” then Gmail will open up the Reply to all option for you.

If, however, you’re not used to the shortcut keys of Gmail (like me) there is a simple setting change that you can change and replace the “Reply” button on the top right of the message with a “Reply to all” button.

I’ve enabled this a couple of weeks ago, and found it quite useful.

It’s very easy to do and takes just takes three steps and can be done as follows:

  1. Go to Options on the top right of the screen.
  2. Click on Labs.
  3. Select “Enable” on the Default “Reply to all” option there. This is the third option from the top as I write this.

 

Gmail Enable Reply to All
Gmail Enable Reply to All

Another thing I’ve noticed when emailing a lot of people in the loop is that if you want to privately email someone who is part of the conversation then you should start a new thread.

At least twice in the last week I’ve seen that when I scroll to see quoted messages – I see emails that were sent to just one person, and that I shouldn’t have seen at all.

I don’t know how exactly that happens and that’s what makes it a bit risky. So, if you’re in a chain email I’d suggest starting a fresh thread referring to the older email if you don’t want everyone to see it at some later point.

Even if this isn’t an error in Gmail it might just be people unable to understand how the conversation works, and making mistakes.

If you know why this happens, please do leave a comment because I’m quite curious about it.

This story had a sad ending

About a year ago I had written about how my grandpa had handed some money to a “business associate” to perform trades on his behalf, and how I was certain that he will lose money.

That was a story about conflict of interest and let me paste a small snippet from that post to give you some background.

He (my grandpa) has made more money in stocks than most people I know, and knows a lot about the markets and investing. His eyesight is really weak these days, and that makes tracking price quotes or just general reading quite difficult. He stopped following the stock market altogether for the past couple of years, but I met him yesterday and he said he has started a new thing.

He has given a small sum to a “business associate” of a big broker, and that guy trades on his behalf. At the end of every day, he sends a report of the money made or lost during the day and the list of trades.

I showed interest in this, and didn’t say anything because I know it keeps him busy and interested, and that is a small price to pay for the loss this business associate will eventually incur on my grandpa’s behalf.

Make no mistake about it, there will be a loss, and it will probably be all of his capital. I say this because of the huge conflict of interest coupled with the frequency of trades. There are so many trades that it is quite apparent that this guy is doing it just for the commissions.

This scene played out much worse than expected and my grandpa did lose money, but it looks like he didn’t put a lot of money with this guy to begin with so he didn’t lose a lot.

However, his friend was not so lucky. He must be in his 70’s and it looks like he gave a major chunk of his money to this so called business associate.

The guy messed up badly and made losses that ran into lacs, and I think it ate into nearly everything that was invested with him.

It was either fraud, or gross incompetence – I don’t think they were able to establish which.

His clients threatened legal action, and the main broker in turn made some losses good – primarily by holding back on the salary and incentives of the business associate.

It looked like the guy had taken a few loans and traded on his own behalf as well, and he lost money there too. So, he was really in a spot, and since he was from out of town he just vanished one day.

After that everyone moved on with their lives, but a few months later – my grandfather’s friend passed away. I don’t know if this incident had anything to do with his death or not, and to be honest when I first heard of his untimely death – this incident didn’t even come to my mind. It’s only recently that I stumbled on my old post, and was reminded of the events.

A grim reminder of how some money mistakes can prove a lot more costly than just losing money.

Sundaram Equity Plus NFO Review

This is another post from the Suggest a Topic page, and today we’re going to take a look at the newly launched Sundaram Equity Plus NFO. This NFO began on May 4th 2011, and will close at May 16th 2011 (not that it matters).

About Sundaram Equity Plus

This is an open ended mutual fund which will hold a minimum of 65% in equity, 15% in gold ETFs, and up to a maximum of 20% in fixed income and money market instruments.

The minimum 65% in equity means that Sundaram Equity Plus will be treated like an equity mutual fund for tax purposes, and under the current rules there will be no long term capital gains. However, these rules are going to change with the DTC taxation rules that will be implemented next financial year.

This is the indicative allocation of the fund:

Asset

Minimum

Maximum

Equity

65%

85%

Gold ETF

15%

35%

Fixed Income

0%

20%

The gold part will be in gold ETFs – they don’t speak about a specific gold ETF, so I think that they might invest in more than one gold ETF.

For the equity part, this is the strategy they quote:

As far as equity part of the portfolio is concerned, the strategy will focus on large-cap stocks – defined as stocks with a market captitalisation (stock price multiplied by outstanding number of shares) not below the 50th stock by value on the National Stock Exchange and aim to create a diversified portfolio with a maximum of 30 stocks.

So, you should expect to own gold ETFs and large cap Nifty stocks when you invest in this fund. The stocks part of it will be actively managed, and the allocation between stocks and gold ETF is also actively managed.

The minimum investment for the NFO is Rs. 5,000 and if you want to get a SIP then Rs. 750 for a quarterly, and Rs. 250 for a monthly one. There is an exit load of 1% if you sell this fund within a year. You don’t have to pay any exit load if you hold it for more than a year.

The fund has a Dividend, Dividend Reinvestment, and Growth Options as part of this fund.

Sundaram Equity Plus Expenses

This mutual fund will incur expenses of 2.5%. This fund incurs double expenses for the gold ETF part of it because they will charge you 2.5% for the fund that they manage, and then the underlying gold ETF will charge 1% or more in expenses. The equity part of Sundaram Equity Plus is direct investment in large cap stocks, so at least for that part of the fund there are no additional fees.

Final Words

In my opinion – the primary (and only?) benefit of this fund is that you can own one asset that gives you exposure to both equity and gold.

However, the 2.5% annual fee is much too high a cost for such a thing. You can very easily create a SIP in one of the best balanced mutual funds and buy the best gold ETF or create a gold SIP in it on your own.

That way you can get absolute control on how much money you want to invest in both, and also be able to choose the funds of your liking without incurring any additional fee at all!

Weekend Links May 6 2011

It’s been quite an eventful week, and I don’t need to tell you what the biggest news this week was!

I’ve read several articles of the attack this week, and I’m highlighting a few that were really good, and some that even gave me goosebumps.

Behind the hunt for Bin Laden: This is a 4 page article by the NYT about how the hunt evolved and is by far the most fascinating account that I’ve read on this topic.

The stealth helicopter that no one knew about: This NYT story is about the stealth helicopter that was used in the mission. They say that if the chopper hadn’t crashed, people wouldn’t even have realized that such a thing exists.

Seal Team 6: This is a very interesting account of the Navy Seal 6 unit – which the article says is among the elite of the elite.

A Bin Laden Hunter on 4 Legs: This story draws a sketch of the attack dog that was part of the team.

Finally, for the skeptics – Al Qaeda has confirmed the death of Osama in their letter.

I think the other big news this week (though not nearly as big) has been the plunge that commodities took, especially silver.

Silver is down 27% this week in COMEX, and should serve as a good reminder to people who think precious metals can only go up, and there’s no way gold or silver can ever fall.

Here is a good Bloomberg story on how commodities behaved this week.

Enjoy your weekend!

Gmail Chat List: Stop Adding Contacts Automatically

Gmail has this annoying feature where it adds everyone you reply to on your Chat list. This is very inconvenient as your regular contacts get lost in your long list, and it also forces you to be invisible at times.

Fortunately, there is an option that changes this to where the person who wants to chat with you has to take permission first. Here is how you go about doing this.

 

Stop Automatic Additions to your Gmail Chat List
Stop Automatic Additions to your Gmail Chat List
  1. Click on the Options icon on the extreme right.
  2. Click on Chat from the list of options.
  3. Go to the “Auto-add suggested contacts” and select “

This will prevent everyone from getting added to your Chat list automatically, and will make your chat list much more manageable and meaningful. When someone wants to chat with you they will have to first send you a request and you will appear in their list only after you have approved that request.

I wasn’t aware of this option until recently, and it’s only when I complained about this to a friend did she tell me that such a thing existed. I’m hoping there are at least a few other people like me who don’t know about it and will find this useful.

Did you know about this feature and are you going to use it?

Introduction to Income Tax

This is another post from the Suggest a Topic page, and in this post we’re going to take a look at some of the main aspects of income tax that affect most salaried people.

The suggestion was to write a post for someone who has just started earning, so I’m going to write this post with what I think are the main aspects that someone who is starting out should be familiar with.

What are deductions?

If you understand deductions in the beginning itself that will make it easier to understand how taxes are calculated later on. Deductions are items that are allowed to be reduced from your taxable income.

For example – current income tax rules allow you to invest up to Rs. 1.2 lacs in certain specified assets, and when you do so, the equivalent amount is reduced from your taxable salary.

So, you could have a salary of Rs. 5 lacs and if you invested Rs. 1 lac in a deductible asset – your taxable salary will only be Rs. 4 lacs, and you won’t have to pay tax on the whole 5 lacs.

It is important to remember that deductions reduce your taxable salary and thereby reduce your taxes. They are not to be directly reduced from your tax liability.

Main Salary Heads

When you look at your salary – you will notice that it’s divided into certain categories, and that’s because current income tax rules allow certain deductions based on different categories.

Usually, you will find the following categories:

1. Basic Pay: Your employer has to contribute a certain percentage of your basic pay to your provident fund which is why this is usually a small part of your total remuneration.

2. Leave Travel Allowance (LTA): LTA is taxed differently from your other salary and there are rules specific to it. That’s why you will find a separate head for that as well. You can read my post about LTA here.

3. House Rent Allowance (HRA): Like LTA, there are special provisions for HRA as well, so it forms a different head of the salary. You can read my post on HRA here.

Income Tax Slabs

India has a progressive tax structure which means that the tax rate increases as your income rises, and you have to pay taxes at a higher rate when your income rises.

For the current financial year following is the tax slab.

Upto 180,000: 0%

180,000 – 500,000: 10%

500,000 – 800,000: 20%

800,000 & above: 30%

This slab is different for women and senior citizens, and you can find all the tax slabs here.

This is fairly straight-forward and the only thing I’d like to mention here is that if you make 9 lacs then not all the 9 lacs is taxed at 30%. Only the sum above 8 lacs (i.e. 1 lac in this case) is taxed at 30%. The rest of the amount is taxed at the rate of the respective slab.

Deductions under Section 80C

If you are just starting to earn (and not a commerce student) then you probably haven’t heard of Section 80C. It’s a section within the Income Tax Act that specifies what instruments you can invest under that allow you a reduction in your taxable income.

This is important because it allows you to save tax and invest your money at the same time. The catch here is that everything under this section comes with a lock in period, so you can’t access your money for some time. That said, try and plan for this section well in advance and take as much advantage of it as possible.

You may find my article on Section 80C Tax Saving instruments useful for this purpose. The maximum tax advantage you can get is Rs. 1 lacs, and your provident fund also forms part this limit so you may not even need to invest the whole amount here.

Deductions under Section 80CCF

80CCF is much like 80C, but adds to the limit available in 80C. Using this section you can reduce an additional Rs. 20,000 from your taxable income over and above the 80C deductions.

You can read my detailed article on 80CCF here.

Capital Gains on Shares and Mutual Funds

Apart from your regular income you may invest in shares and mutual funds as well, and any gains from these sources are called Capital Gains and treated differently from your regular income.

You can take a look at my post on capital gains on shares and mutual funds to get a quick view on how dividends and capital gains are taxed on these instruments.

Tax on Debt Instruments

I had written a post earlier on tax specifically related to debt instruments and this might come in handy if you want answers on what instrument attracts TDS, on which ones you need to pay tax even though there is no TDS etc.

Conclusion

In my opinion, knowing these things about tax will be a good start for someone who is starting to earn. This is basic information that most people should have, and at the same time it’s not likely that it overwhelms you either.

Do let me know if you have any other questions, or if you think I missed something.

Book Review: Ogilvy on Advertising

I’ve just finished reading Ogilvy on Advertising and even though I’ve never held an advertising job, and don’t intend to pursue that career – I absolutely loved it.

The book itself feels great in your hand – terrific look and feel, and is filled with pearls of wisdom about advertising on a range of subjects from how to make TV commercials that sell to competing with P&G.

I’m not quite sure how I ended up picking up this book, and I wasn’t quite sure what to expect from it, but I breezed through it, and felt annoyed the few times I had to put it down to get to the real world.

I’ve learned a few things that I hope to use for OneMint and some of my other  work, and ultimately if you think about it – advertising is selling, and a lot of us have to do it at some point or the other in our careers.

The book is divided into chapters with each chapter tackling a specific issue and providing answer to a specific problem. These few titles will tell you what I’m talking about:

  • Jobs in advertising – and how to get them?
  • How to advertise foreign travel?
  • Advertising for good causes

The book is filled with actionable and practical tips for advertisers and there are many many tips and guidelines on how to do certain things.

For instance, Mr. Ogilvy asks everyone that they advertise with black words on white background and not the other way round since that makes it harder to read. In another instance he talks about having the caption of an image below it and not above it to be read by more people.

Another example that I liked came from the chapter on direct mail, in which he writes a small section on television for persuading people to buy directly by mail or phone he writes the following:

The better the program on which your commercials appear, the fewer sales you make. When viewers are bored by an old movie, they are more likely to pick up the telephone and order your product than when they are riveted by an episode of Dallas.

There are many many rules like that, and there are a lot of interesting stories as well – like one where he says that while advertising for Cessna Citation business jets they sent out live carrier pigeons with an invitation to take a free ride in the jet!

He says that some recipients actually ate the pigeon but many returned alive and they sold at least one jet for $600,000!

There are many ad copies in the book as well, and I found myself flipping through them at leisure and looking at all the great stuff there.

I thoroughly enjoyed the book and am now looking forward to reading his first book as well. I don’t however feel that everyone will like it as much as I did.

In my opinion, you should at least have some interest in advertising, or must be required to sell in some capacity to truly enjoy and appreciate the book, and a lot of people simply don’t have these type of job functions.

But in case you are interested in the book you can find Ogilvy on Advertising on Amazon.

Disclosure: Both book links are Amazon affiliate links.

DTC Impact: Capital Gains on Sale of Shares

The DTC (Direct Tax Code) will change the way capital gains are taxed on shares, and although still not finalized, here is my understanding on how capital gains will be imposed under the new DTC regime.

Short term or long term under DTC

The revised DTC discussion paper says that assets will no longer be treated as short term investment or long term investment based on how long you hold them, but the calculation will be done from the end of the financial year in which you own the asset.

Right now, if I buy a share on April 1 2011, and sell it on April 2nd 2012 – it will be treated as a long term capital asset, and the gains will be tax free.

With the introduction of DTC – the holding period will be calculated from the end of the financial year in which it was acquired, so in my example – the holding period will be calculated from March 31st 2012 and I will have to pay short term capital gains on it.

This will probably have the most impact on FMPs that are issued in March of this year to be redeemed in April of the next year to get benefit of double indexation.

Under the new regime this won’t be possible.

(Source: Revised Discussion Paper: Chapter V Section 3.2)

DTC Impact Capital Gains on Shares
DTC Impact Capital Gains on Shares

Tax Rate on Capital Gains on Shares under DTC

Currently, long term capital gains on shares are tax free, while short term capital gains are charged at 15%. In the new DTC regime – capital gains will be added to the income of the individual and will be taxed at the rate applicable to the taxpayer.

Short term capital gains on shares under DTC

Short term capital gains will be taxed on the tax slab of the investor. Your profit will be added to your income, and then you will be taxed based on whatever slab you fall under.

Long term capital gains on shares under DTC

This is where it becomes slightly complex. Currently you don’t have to pay any capital gains on long term capital gains but in the future you will have to pay tax on the capital gains – but not the whole amount.

The government will allow you to deduct a certain percentage from your capital gain based on some parameter which I think will be how long you held the share for.

So, say you make Rs. 1,000 in gains for shares you held for a year, and the government says that for one year you’re allowed to deduct 50% from your capital gains for the purpose of tax -  then instead of adding Rs. 1,000 to your taxable income, you will only have to add Rs. 500 to your taxable income.

This will then be taxed at your tax slab.

As far as I know the method of computing the deduction has not been out yet, and the discussion paper only gives examples.

Final Words

I have been holding off on writing about this because there is still some way to go and not everything has been finalized but there’s a lot of interest in the subject and I think it’s better to at least get started on this topic here.

The source of my article has been this revised discussion paper here, but if you know of a revision after that version, then do let me know and I’ll update my post.