This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at [email protected].in
Will you deposit your hard-earned money with a company for which even the existing lenders have closed their doors? Is 11.5% rate of interest for 1-year deposit or 12.5% rate of interest for 3-year deposit attractive enough for you to risk your principal investment itself?
Shilpa raised a query regarding Gitanjali Gems’ Fixed Deposit scheme under Suggest A Topic.
Shilpa Ganeriwal July 4, 2013 at 9:16 am
The recent full page advertisement in ET about the fixed deposit scheme launch by geetanjali jewellers looked interesting. THe interest rate offered was 11.5 %. I was looking for CRISIL rating or any such type but could not get.
My question is what could be the reason for such a way of raising money, is it something like an NBFC and how reliable could this be.
Details of Gitanjali Gems Fixed Deposit Scheme:
The company does not allow premature withdrawal during first 6 months from the date of deposit. The terms of the deposit also states “Request for premature withdrawal may be permitted after 6 months with specific reason at the sole discretion of the Company only and cannot be claimed as a matter of right by the Depositor”.
Also, even if you are permitted to withdraw your investment anytime after 6 months, the company will pay 1% lower rate of interest than the applicable rate.
As I started writing this post, the share price of Gitanjali Gems Ltd. was at Rs. 181.10 on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Rs. 183.15 on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), locked down at the lower circuit of 5%. Let me tell you that there were 404 sell orders pending on the NSE alone, with the sellers desperate to find an exit door by selling 1,32,37,259 shares of the company. But they are not able to do so as the buyers are just not interested in paying even Rs. 181.10 for a stock which touched an intraday high of Rs. 534.05 on June 20th this year and has fallen 66.08% since then, hitting new 52-week lows.
In fact, Gitanjali Gems is not the only stock in the Gems & Jewellery sector which has seen a sharp fall in its share prices. Titan, Shree Ganesh Jewellery House, Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri (TBZ) etc. are some of the companies which have suffered huge market cap erosion due to a sharp fall in their share prices in the last one month or so.
Gitanjali Gems 1-Year Price Chart
Titan Industries 1-Year Price Chart
Shree Ganesh Jewellery House Limited (SGJHL) 1-Year Price Chart
Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri (TBZ) 1-Year Price Chart
Images Source: Bloomberg.com
The primary reason behind this huge fall in the share prices of all these companies which belong to the Gems & Jewellery sector is very well known – a steep fall in gold prices in the international markets, which was triggered by fears of the US Federal Reserve tapering quantitative easing (QE). Gold prices have fallen around 35% from a 52-week high of $1804/oz on October 4th last year to touch a 52-week low of $1179/oz on June 28th last week.
Also, the government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) have taken several measures in the past few months to slow down gold imports, which have been blamed for the widening of our current account deficit (CAD). Last month, the government raised the import duty on gold from 6% to 8%, after which the RBI issued a notification, restricting gold imports only with 100% cash margin. Due to all these factors, gold demand has slowed down considerably here in India.
But, what is wrong with Gitanjali Gems? Analysing its financial statements, it seems the company has been doing quite well in the past and stands on a very strong footing. So, do the measures taken by the government and the RBI make business so difficult for the company that it is likely to see a sharp fall in its profitability or make the company default on its loans and other credit facilities? Are all these the only factors behind this kind of a steep fall in the share prices of Gitanjali Gems? I do not think so. I think there is something else also and SEBI is likely probing that.
SEBI’s surveillance department has taken up the matter and sought reports from exchanges on the stock’s sharp price movement. Market rumors also suggest that SEBI is also examining a suspicious trading link between Gitanjali and Prime Securities, a well known broker firm. It suspects that Prime Securities had a role to play in the internal funding of as much as Rs. 75-100 crore during Gitanjali’s IPO period.
At the end of March 31, 2013, Gitanjali Gems carries a gross debt of Rs. 5,000 crore in its balance sheet, at an average rate of interest of approximately 8%. As on this date, the promoters of Gitanjali have around 34.96% of their shareholding being pledged with their lenders.
Since June 18th, Gitanjali Gems has made several filings to the BSE, in which it has disclosed that Mehul Choksi, Chairman and Managing Director of Gitanjali Gems, has purchased a large quantity of Gitanjali shares from the open market and have pledged them further to the company’s lenders. In the past few days, some of the lenders have even invoked these pledges, including Macquarie Finance (India) Private Limited (MFIPL) which has invoked 5 million pledged shares in just two days, June 28th and July 1st, acquiring 5.43% stake in the company. Lenders generally invoke pledged shares when a borrower, faced with a steep fall in its share price, is not able to deposit additional margin with the lenders.
So, amid all this high-tension drama playing out within the company and the gold market, is it advisable to lock your money for 3 years in Gitanjali Gems’ Fixed Deposit scheme for 12.5% annual return?
Personally, I am not going to do that as the safety of my principal is more important for me rather than a promise of higher returns and I am sure the investors also know the answer and need no further advice regarding the same.
Some financial advisors have different views regarding the same and their views are also welcome.
Myinvestmentideas.com
Saving-Ideas.com
ProfitKrishna.com
This is a good topic for a post, and I thought I would broaden the scope a little and answer why a company issues bonus shares and then my opinion on the implications of a bonus issue. I use ‘opinion’ because I’m not going to use any data to share what I think about bonus issues.
Why does a company issue bonus shares?
When a company issues a bonus shares the price of its existing shares come down by about the same ratio as the bonus shares that have been issued. So if the bonus issue is 1:1 which means they are issuing one additional share for each existing share, the market price of the share will roughly halve.
When the price falls, the liquidity of the share improves, and that to me is the primary reason for a company to issue bonus shares. I think an example shows this quite well. What if a single share of a company was Rs. 93,26,940 – how many people do you think will trade in this share?
What if the same share was worth Rs. 6,177? Wouldn’t a lot more people now trade in this share?
The two prices I took were the price of Berkshire Hathaway’s class A and class B shares. Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway never paid a dividend, issued a bonus, or conducted a split for decades and as a result their class A share is worth roughly $167,000.
I feel that the primary reason for all splits and bonus issues is allowing the share price to fall in value to facilitate trading.
What are the advantages of issuing bonus shares?
Facilitating trading is the one big benefit of issuing bonus shares, but this is from the perspective of the company, how do investors benefit from bonus issues?
People view bonus issues as a positive action, but I’m not sure why that is. As soon as the number of shares increase, the value of each share goes down in value, so theoretically there are no gains to be had just because of a bonus issue.
I came across a Business Today article about the features and advantages of bonus issues and according to the data they analyzed – there is a good chance that the companies that issued bonus shares rise in the year after the issue. You can read the whole article to see the data they looked at and then their interpretation of it. My own opinion on this is that this is one of those things where correlation does not always mean causation.
The companies they looked at rose, but what about other similar companies? How much did the companies that rose actually rose and for how long? They stopped after a year but what after that year?
I don’t know what the answer to these questions is but I’ve never come across anything that showed without doubt that bonus issues  are an indication that the company will outperform the market.